SNF admissions software
How AdmitScore organizes payer, clinical, documentation, medication, and facility fit signals before bed hold.
Medicare Advantage Review
Authorization readiness before the SNF says yes.
AdmitScore™ helps admissions teams flag Medicare Advantage payer signals, prior authorization questions, skilled-need documentation gaps, and verification steps before making an admission decision.
What AdmitScore flags
Authorization risk is rarely just one missing field.
The platform is intended to assist review. It does not guarantee payer approval, reimbursement, admission outcomes, or denial prevention.
Payer detected by AI
Shows payer information that should be verified against the referral packet, eligibility checks, and payer portal.
Authorization readiness
Flags whether packet content appears to support prior authorization review, pending staff verification.
Skilled need support
Helps identify therapy, nursing, wound, medication, or care documentation that may support SNF level of care.
Missing documentation
Surfaces gaps such as missing therapy evaluations, orders, medication records, or discharge details.
Follow-up questions
Produces questions for the case manager, payer, internal clinical team, or finance reviewer.
Outcome tracking
Tracks recurring authorization and documentation issues by payer, referral source, and facility.
What an MA-ready packet contains
The eight things admissions teams check on every Medicare Advantage referral.
AdmitScore runs through this list automatically and surfaces what's missing. Staff still verify each item against source documents. None of these guarantee payer approval. They're the prerequisites that make approval possible.
- Payer identified and verified. MA plan name, plan type, and member ID match the payer face sheet. Eligibility confirmed against the payer portal before bed hold.
- Benefit period confirmed. Member effective dates active for the planned admission date. Coverage status not terminated, suspended, or pending.
- Network status checked for SNF level of care. Facility in-network for the specific MA product. Out-of-network arrangements negotiated in writing before acceptance, not after.
- Carve-outs reviewed. High-cost meds, dialysis, behavioral health, and DME flagged against carve-out language. Cost exposure understood before bed hold.
- Authorization scope documented. Initial authorized days, escalation pathway, and continued-stay review cadence clear. No assumptions about "we'll get more days later."
- Skilled-need supporting documentation present. Therapy evaluation, nursing notes, medication record, and discharge summary support the SNF level of care being requested.
- ALOS expectations aligned with packet. The packet's clinical complexity matches the average length-of-stay the payer typically authorizes for that diagnosis and functional status.
- Denial-risk indicators flagged. Patterns the payer has historically rejected (observation status pre-admission, missing therapy eval, ambiguous skilled need) called out before acceptance.
Where MA decisions go wrong
The four failure modes admissions teams see most often.
Bed held before payer verified
Acceptance moves faster than the payer portal check. Network status, benefit period, or member ID turns out wrong on day 2, and the bed is already held. AdmitScore returns payer signals in the same minute as the clinical review so staff verify before the hold.
Carve-outs missed in the packet
A high-cost medication or a behavioral health carve-out only surfaces when the pharmacy bill arrives. AdmitScore flags carve-out exposure in the medication + care-cost surface so finance sees it before acceptance, not after.
Authorization scope assumed, not confirmed
"We'll get more days later" doesn't always work. AdmitScore separates authorized initial days from the escalation pathway in the authorization-readiness surface so staff know exactly what's contracted and what isn't.
Clinical and financial pressure mixed
When the same readout shows clinical fit and revenue impact side-by-side, financial pressure can leak into clinical judgment. AdmitScore returns two scores by role: Referral Fit (financial-free, all roles) stays on the clinical review; Margin Score (admin-only) layers in PDPM and denial-risk for administrators.
Related admissions resources
Connect payer review to the rest of the admission decision.
These public pages use synthetic or general examples only. They frame questions staff should verify before acceptance.
PDPM admissions signals
Admissions-level PDPM indicators that should be interpreted as planning context, not reimbursement guarantees.
ExaCare alternative
A focused comparison for teams weighing broad post-acute AI platforms against a narrower SNF referral review workflow.
Plain-English disclaimer
AdmitScore supports payer review; staff verify and decide.
No guaranteed authorization
Outputs are review aids and should not be represented as payer approval.
No guaranteed denial prevention
The product helps flag potential issues, but payer outcomes still depend on payer rules and documentation.
Source verification required
AI-extracted payer and clinical information should be verified against source documents.
Facility staff make final decisions
Clinical, operational, payer, and legal judgment remains with the facility.
FAQ
Medicare Advantage authorization readiness questions.
Does AdmitScore guarantee Medicare Advantage authorization approval?
No. AdmitScore helps staff review authorization readiness and possible documentation gaps, but payer approval depends on payer rules, source documentation, and staff verification.
What should SNF staff verify before accepting a Medicare Advantage referral?
Staff should verify payer, member eligibility, network status, initial authorization scope, continued-stay review expectations, skilled-need support, carve-outs, and missing documentation.
How does AdmitScore support MA authorization readiness?
AdmitScore surfaces payer, documentation, medication, and clarification questions from the referral packet so facility staff can verify source documents before bed hold.